Developers Opposing Everett 24-03 Are Lying Again
David Toyer’s recent letter-to-the-editor in the Snohomish County Tribune opposing Everett Initiative 24-03 raises questionable intentions. As a key figure behind the developer-funded PAC opposing this initiative, his motives are clear: to maintain the status quo that benefits developers at the expense of our environment.
Toyer’s claims about the initiative’s negative impacts are exaggerated and misleading. Let’s examine each one.
- Usurp federal and state law: WRONG! Section E.(1) of Everett 24-03 says that “this ordinance shall not be applicable to areas of law that have been validly preempted by state or federal law.
- No scientific evidence: WRONG! Everett Initiative 24-03 just doesn’t require scientific “certainty,” but credible, scientific evidence is always required for lawsuits.
- Legitimize frivolous lawsuits: WRONG! Our legal system has safeguards to ensure that only valid, serious environmental harms are pursued.
- Taxpayers financially responsible: WRONG! Protecting our natural resources is crucial for flood control, water quality, and overall community well-being. Not having to pay for environmental damage save the community in the long run.
- Dissuade businesses: WRONG! In 20204, businesses don’t have to harm the watershed to be successful. In fact, businesses are attracted to a communities concerned about sustainability that creates a healthy environment for their customers and employees.
- Push back on extending light rail to Everett, expanding the Port’s waterfront district, and creating affordable housing: WRONG! Not if they’re not harming the watershed.

Everett Initiative 24-03 empowers the community to defend its watershed in court, providing essential protections for our ecosystem where current legal frameworks might fall short.
Toyer’s focus on preserving the status quo reflects the interests of developers, who are the primary opposition to this initiative and stand to gain from current practices. In contrast, voting yes on Everett 24-03 is a vote for sustainable development and responsible stewardship. It’s an opportunity to secure a healthier future for our community and ensure that we protect the environment for generations to come.